The 1908 1d omitted overprint is one of the greatest rarities of New Hebrides philately. The stamp was issued on October 29, 1908. |
|
The first information I found that there was a great rarity in this issue was a notice in GSM: (graphical layout below)
|
Hals / Collas in their book "The New Hebrides - Postal Stamps and Their History" (Collector's Club Handbook 20, New York 1967) write that in 1911 and for many years after it was thought that the top row of the sheet did not have an overprint. The block Power presented had no selvedges and one couldn't find the truth. |
I found an article in the Australian Stamp Journal discussing stamps as an investment. The author speaks of one row but I think that the right part of the sheet was not known then. But regarding the printing process there must have been a complete row without the overprint. |
R.J.G. Collins wrote about the omitted overprints in his book "The Stamps of the Pacific Islands" for the Christchurch Philatelic Society in 1924: |
||
In the November 26, 1935 auction of Harmer of London a vertical pair was offered at the auction as lot 290, the upper stamp without overprint. For reasons you will see below thus must have come from the E.B. Power block. Maybe it was here that King Georg V got his copy. At this time the existence of only six pairs was still certified. |
In the year 1939 a remarkable block of 2 x 5 showed up from the right top corner of the sheet. It was sold by Harmers of London who sent me images of the catalogue from their archive. Many thanks for this help! |
This item was sold on November 28th 1939 as lot 334 for 52 pounds and 10 shillings. I think that this was a huge amount of money in 1939. Nevertheless a good return when it could be sold for £12,000 or even more nowadays. But regarding the 1939 value of the £ these £52 would have been about 1,500 €. Later it came in the possession of Stan Jersey, U.S.A. and was then offered as lot 281 at the 18 June 1985 Chriestie's Robson Lowe auction. The estimate was £10,000 and the item was not sold. Later Argyll Etkin of London sold the item to a French collector. It is still in his possession. |
In 1967 PACIFICA, the periodical of the Pacific Islands Study Circle PISC wrote: |
The colours of the following scans look different as they were made in many different years on various machines. The real stamps of course have the same colour. |
Left: On 30 January 2009 it sold at Victoria Stamp Company, Ridgewood, NJ, U.S.A. for 8,500 US$ + fees.
distinctive feature: item has left and upper selvedge.
Right: distinctive feature: item has upper selvedge. |
Left: distinctive feature: short 4th tooth from bottom right, long/short/long teeth at lower left of second stamp from bottom.
|
Now we have the right part of the sheet complete. The middle three must not necessarily be a the correct place. I tried to align them correctly but sometimes the perforation doesn't tell enough. |
||
Left: distinctive feature: short tooth at bottom left of upper stamp. Right; distinctive feature: long tooth at top right lower stamp. |
Left: distinctive feature: short third tooth at top right.
distinctive feature: fat tooth at bottom below the 1. |
Left:
It was in the 18th June 1985 Christie's Robson Lowe auction of the Stan Jersey collection. Offered there as
"281 1D. red. A fresh mint vertical pair. One with overprint omitted. The finest recorded example of this
rarity. Estimate £6,000". It was not sold. It had a 1978 André Nussbaum, Basel, expert A.I.E.P.
certificate.
distinctive feature: long tooth 3rd from bottom right on upper stamp.
Right: distinctive feature: the perforation looks reinforced. |
Now we have a complete left part of the sheet. The pairs need not necessarily be a the correct position. I tried to align them correctly but sometimes the perforation is not conclusive. |
||
Now we come to my two difficult cases of this prominent error: I have reason to believe that these two stamps
are genuine and so is the overprint. But I don't know where they come from. The only possible conclusion I think is
that after the sheet above had been printed the third row was also starting to fall out. |
Left: distinctive feature: long-short-short-long teeth below the 1d at bottom.
distinctive feature: perforation between the stamps seems to be reinforced. Not to be seen in 1994 and 2000. Long-short-long teeth below the 1d at bottom. |
As the overprint of the right stamp is slightly lower it should have had a position at right of the other stamp. If it fits directly cannot be said from the image. It could be. If not, there should have been another error stamp in between and the overprints of these two copies are not in line. Of course a couple of stamps right of these with lower overprint could also be possible. |
The inclination along the overprint looks perfect. This should be evidence that the two stamps were neighbours. |
The right on was offered in June 2014 with an estimate of £2500 by |
So the result of this survey is that we have the errors of a complete sheet plus two originating from another sheet. The number
of 14 errors has been constant during the last years. It is not certain if the copy only known from the Sandafayre Library still exists.
|